META SYNTHESIS OF STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT BETWEEN INDONESIA AND AUSTRALIA BASED ON CONSTANT MARKET SHARE PERSPECTIVE

Gunawan Wibisono; Nanik  Kustiningsih; Lanny Regina  Susanti

doi:10.29062/mahardika.v21i3.630

Authors

Gunawan Wibisono Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahardhika
Nanik Kustiningsih STIE Mahardhika Surabaya
Lanny Regina Susanti STIE Mahardhika Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v21i3.630

Keywords:

Indonesia, Australia, FTA, CMSA, TRQ, Free Trade

Abstract

The conditions of intense competition in the international market have encouraged Indonesia to be able to compete with other export products from other countries. One of the simple solutions is that the export products that are sold must be of very high quality and take advantage of the empty gaps in the international market. The main way is to fully optimize from viewing and analyzing market strategies. So the nature of our trade will look more offensive to the industrial economy. The use of FTAs is only for reducing tariffs and helping the flow of goods, but Indonesia must also be able to provide encouragement intensively so that these goods can win in one of the FTA areas. The solution presented is directing or piloting starting from one type of export goods. The author observes that the strategy or stages planned with method of meta synthesis. Indonesia are effective in the potential to increase and win Indonesian export products. First, studies by providing solutions on how Indonesian export products can compete and win in one of their destination countries. Second, deepening in the export market shows market power and sends market intelligence to make observations to the micro scale regarding export products and analysis of every policy and solution issued to that country. Third, the overall implementation and application of policy solutions to win Indonesian export products. One of the mistakes made at the implementation stage was said to be exports that were not quite right by Australia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abedi Jafari, A., & Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-Synthesis as a Method for Synthesizing Qualitative Researches. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(99).

Arianpoor, A., & Salehi, M. (2021). A framework for business sustainability performance using meta-synthesis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2020-0040

Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M., & Ahern, A. (2011). Introduction: Procedural meaning. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, 25(February 2015), xvii–xlv. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1472-7870(2011)0000025004

Felbermayr, G., Teti, F., & Yalcin, E. (2019). Rules of origin and the profitability of trade deflection. Journal of International Economics, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.07.003

Gusrini, A. M. (2020). HUBUNGAN BILATERAL INDONESIA-AUSTRALIA: KEPENTINGAN AUSTRALIA DALAM MERATIFIKASI INDONESIA-AUSTRALIA COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TAHUN 2019. TRANSBORDERS: International Relations Journal, 4(1).

Helmiah, N., & Nasrudin. (2021). SIMULASI KEBIJAKAN PADA IMPLEMENTASI PERJANJIAN KOMPREHENSIF INDONESIA-AUSTRALIA (IA-CEPA) TERHADAP PASAR DAGING SAPI DOMESTIK. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v15i2.633

Ifada, V. Y., & Sholeh, B. (2021). Indonesia-Australia Cooperation in Handling Environmental Issues through the IAFCP Program (Indonesia-Australia Forest Carbon Partnership). Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 14.

Kniahin, D., & de Melo, J. (2022). A Primer on Rules of Origin as Non-Tariff Barriers. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070286

Lestari, E. A. P. (2021). Complex Interdependence Between Indonesia-Australia Through Cybersecurity Cooperation Post-Indonesia-Australia Cyberwar in 2013. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v9i2.10522

Li, Y. T. (2022). Asymmetrical understandings of the value of time between Taiwanese Working Holiday Makers and the Australian government: Cultural exchange or serving time? Sociological Review, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211062303

Mukunoki, H., & Okoshi, H. (2021). Rules of origin and consumer-hurting free trade agreements*. World Economy, 44(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13097

Nabbs-Keller, G. (2020). Understanding Australia-Indonesia relations in the post-authoritarian era: resilience and respect. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1725423

Nagurney, A., Besik, D., & Nagurney, L. S. (2019). Global supply chain networks and tariff rate quotas: equilibrium analysis with application to agricultural products. Journal of Global Optimization, 75(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-019-00794-x

Ohmori, S., Huang, Q., & Yoshimoto, K. (2019). Global supply chain network design problem with rules of origin. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2977

Reilly, A. (2015). Low-cost labour or cultural exchange? Reforming the Working Holiday visa programme. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304615598160

Rissy, Y. Y. W. (2021). TANTANGAN DAN STRATEGI PELAKSANAAN INDONESIA-AUSTRALIA COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IA-CEPA). Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p179-198

Rusmin, J. H., Suryadi, A., & Abdullah, N. (2017). Perjanjian Kerjasama Ekonomi Komprehensif Antara Indonesia Dan Australia. Universitas Khaolik Parahyangan.

Rusmin, J. H., Suryadi, A., & Abdullah, N. (2021). Analisis Proses Perundingan Kerja Sama IA-CEPA (Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement) Tahun 2013-2018. In Hasanuddin Journal of International Affairs (Vol. 1, Issue 2).

Varalakshmi, K., & Devatkal, S. (2017). Competitiveness of Indian bovine meat exports - Constant market share analysis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(8).

Verico, K. (2017). The Impact of ASEAN FTA: Regional Level Analysis. In The Future of the ASEAN Economic Integration. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59613-0_2