AKUNTABILITAS DAN TRANSPARANSI BANTUAN KEUANGAN PARTAI POLITIK DI KABUPATEN X

Indah Permata Sari; Khairul

doi:10.29062/mahardika.v23i1.1213

Authors

Indah Permata Sari Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Haji Agus Salim Bukittinggi
Khairul STISIP Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v23i1.1213

Keywords:

Public Accountability, Public Transparency, Political Party Financial Aid

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the accountability and transparency of financial assistance provided to political parties in a regency. The study employs observations and documentation to enhance data accuracy. Accountability is assessed using Koppell's four dimensions, while transparency is evaluated through Bovens' three perspectives. The findings reveal that accountability for political party financial assistance in the regency is weak, largely due to the lack of government oversight, which increases the risk of budget mismanagement or diversion. The roles of the Audit Board (BPK) and the Regional Government are limited to auditing, guiding, and monitoring, without any control over the financial assistance given to political parties. Furthermore, political parties have not fully complied with the requirements for submitting accountability reports. In terms of transparency, political parties receiving financial assistance have not effectively implemented transparent practices. There is a tendency for political parties to restrict access to financial information, limiting it to political circles, making it difficult for the public to obtain details about party performance. Additionally, the legal framework established by the government lacks sanctions for non-compliance with transparency requirements, which hinders the achievement of the intended level of public transparency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhudianto, W. (2007). Pergeseran_Paradigma_Administrasi_Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(23), 1–23.

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., Schillemans, T., & Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency. In The Oxford Handbook Of Public Accountability (Issue June 2018, Pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.1093/Oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0043

Chandra Puspita Kurniawati1, Oktarika Ayoe Sandha2, S. S., & Entang Adhy Muhtar1, R. P. (2023). Menyelidiki Akuntabilitas Subsidi Negara Pada Partai Politik. 201–225.

Jimly Asshiddigue. (2006). Sistem Tata Negara Kerajaan Majapahit. J Urnal, 163. Http://Www.Mahkamahkonstitusi.Go.Id/Putusan/Book_Volume3nomor4desember2006.Pdf#Page=164

Jubaedah, E. (2011). Implementasi Kebijakan Transparansi Keuangan Di Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, Viii(34), 288–299.

Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies Of Accountability: Icann And The Challenge Of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1540-6210.2005.00434.X

Kusumawati, M. P. (2019). Harmonisasi Antara Etika Publik Dan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(1), 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.35586/Jyur.V6i1.794

Maani Dt, K. (2009). Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Dalam Pelayananan Publik. Demokrasi, No 1(Viii), 48.

Natasyah, O. C. (2019). Penerapan Prinsip Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Dpd Partai Golkar Kota Surabaya Terhadap Pengelolaan Bantuan Keuangan Partai Politik. Jurnal Politik Muda, 7(3), 93–107.

Ndout, A., Sopanah, A., & Dewi, I. (2023). Analisis Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Keuangan Partai Politik Yang Bersumber Dari Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi (Jrma), 11(2), 219–228. Https://Ejournal.Unikama.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jrma/Article/View/9168

Ristyawati, A. (2019). Penguatan Partai Politik Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Pengadministrasian Dan Pelembagaan Sistem Demokrasi. Administrative Law And Governance Journal, 2(4), 710–120. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Alj.V2i4.710-120

Rosidi, R. (2017). Strategi Komunikasi Politik Dan Budaya Transparasi Partai Politik. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan, Majalah Ilmiah Program Studi Ilmu Politik, 2(1), 78–100. Https://Doi.Org/10.55745/Jpp.V2i1.15

Rufaedah, Y. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Pencapaian Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian (Wtp) Atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Lkpd) Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Sigma-Mu, 12(2), 44–64. Https://Doi.Org/10.35313/Sigmamu.V12i2.2584

Sevilla, J. (2006). Accountability And Control Of Public Spending In A Decentralised And Delegated Environment. Oecd Journal On Budgeting, 5(2), 7–21. Https://Doi.Org/10.1787/Budget-V5-Art8-En

Syawawi, R. (2021). Memutus Oligarki Dan Klientelisme Dalam Sistem Politik Indonesia Melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Pendanaan Partai Politik Oleh Negara. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 139. Https://Doi.Org/10.54629/Jli.V18i1.752

Trisakti, F., Muljawan, A. R., Muthmainah, A., & ... (2023). Pentingnya Etika Dan Akuntabilitas Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 21(1), 22–31. Http://Www.Jurnaldialektika.Com/Index.Php/Piani/Article/View/128%0ahttps://Www.Jurnaldialektika.Com/Index.Php/Piani/Article/Download/128/118

Wicaksono, K. W. (2015). Akuntabilitas Organisasi Sektor Publik. Jkap (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 19(1), 17. Https://Doi.Org/10.22146/Jkap.7523

Widayanti, W., Priyadi, M. P., & Ardini, L. (2019). Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Pada Laporan Keuangan Partai (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Dpd Partai Demokrat Provinsi Jawa Timur). Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 135–156. Https://Doi.Org/10.35591/Wahana.V22i2.170